Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/7] containers (V7): Generic container system abstracted from cpusets code

Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-03-25T08:14:33Z

On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:43:48PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> I'm unsure here, but this 'tsk->cpuset == cs' test feels fragile to me.
>
> How about a bit earlier in attach_task(), right at the point we overwrite the
> victim tasks cpuset pointer, we decrement the count on the old cpuset, and if
> it went to zero, remember that we'll need to release it, once we've dropped
> some locks:

Looks neater. Will adopt this when I send the patch. Thanks.

--
Regards,
vatsa