Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem

Paul Menage
2007-04-03T15:45:55Z

On 4/3/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> But frankly I don't know where we stand right now wrt the containers
> patches. Do most people want to go with Vatsa's latest version moving
> containers into nsproxy? Has any other development been going on?
> Paul, have you made any updates?

I've not made major changes since the last patch post, just some small
optimizations and fixes - I've been too tied up with other stuff.

Whilst I've got no objection in general to using nsproxy rather than
the container_group object that I introduced in my latest patches, I
think that Vatsa's approach of losing the general container object is
flawed, since it loses any kind of per-group generic state (e.g. "this
container is being deleted") and last time I saw it, I think it would
tend to lose processes so that they didn't show up in any directory in
the container fs.

Paul