From: "Kawai, Hidehiro" <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Satoshi OSHIMA <soshima@redhat.com>,
"Hideo AOKI@redhat" <haoki@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] coredump: core dump masking support v2
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:26:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45D30DEA.4020309@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070203124853.GA4191@elf.ucw.cz>
Hi,
I'm sorry that I couldn't reply you sooner.
Pavel Machek wrote:
>>Okay, I'll adopt your idea in the next version.
>>I'm going to provide the proc entry as follows:
>>
>> (1) /proc/<pid>/core_flags/flags
>> (2) /proc/<pid>/core_flags/omit_anon_shared
>>
>>(1) is the same as current core_flags. It is for expert users.
>>(2) corresponds to one bit in (1).
>>If (2) is set to 1, anonymous shared memory of the process is never
>>dumped.
>
> Now, that's what I call an ugly interface.
I considered for a while, and then I decided not to use the
above-stated interfaces. Instead, I'll create just one proc entry
to access to one core dump flag:
/proc/<pid>/coredump_omit_anonymous_shared
I think it is simple enough.
Would you think it is still ugly?
> Can we simply add ulimit with boolean value, that says dump
> anon_shared... or not? It will be simpler and faster, because you'll
> not need locking.
Yes, using ulimit will be simpler and faster, but less flexible.
The core dump flags can be changed only before running the program.
If the user modifies the program, the user will be able to change the
flags anytime. But the user can't always modify the program.
I need the ability to change the core dump flags anytime.
Thanks,
--
Hidehiro Kawai
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-14 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-26 14:05 [PATCH 0/4] coredump: core dump masking support v2 Kawai, Hidehiro
2007-01-26 14:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] coredump: add an interface to specify omitted memory segment types Kawai, Hidehiro
2007-01-26 14:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] coredump: enable to omit anonymous shared memory Kawai, Hidehiro
2007-01-26 14:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] coredump: add a sysctl parameter to disable the core dump omitting feature Kawai, Hidehiro
2007-01-26 16:56 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-26 14:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] coredump: documentation for proc and sysctl Kawai, Hidehiro
2007-01-26 15:29 ` [PATCH 0/4] coredump: core dump masking support v2 Robin Holt
2007-01-30 7:36 ` Kawai, Hidehiro
2007-01-30 12:44 ` Robin Holt
2007-01-31 12:40 ` Kawai, Hidehiro
2007-02-03 12:48 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-14 13:26 ` Kawai, Hidehiro [this message]
2007-02-14 13:30 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45D30DEA.4020309@hitachi.com \
--to=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=haoki@redhat.com \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=soshima@redhat.com \
--cc=yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox