From: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] automatic tuning applied to some kernel components
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:25:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45D418DC.5040605@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1d54bn9lo.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net> writes:
>
>
>>But, what do you do with Oracle that's asking maxfiles to be set to 0x10000,
>>while the default value might be enough for a system that's not running Oracle.
>>I'm afraid that giving boot time values to the max_* tunables we will loose all
>>the benefits from /proc (or /sys): it is impossible to anticipate what an OS
>>will be used for. So allowing such things to be changed without having to reboot
>>the machine is in my mind quite a powerful feature we should keep taking
>>adavntage of.
>
>
> I'm not saying remove user spaces' ability to set the
> denial-of-service limits. I'm saying if they need to be frequently
> changed we need to update the default so they are higher by default.
>
> There really is no cost in moving those values up and down it is just
> an arbitrary integer used in comparisons. But if we can make a good
> guess that still catches runaway programs before they kill the machine
> but also allows more programs to work out of the box we are in better
> shape.
>
OK, happy to see we are on the same wavelength (and sorry for
misunderstanding what you were saying ;-) )
Regards,
Nadia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-15 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-16 6:15 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Automatice kernel tunables (AKT) Nadia.Derbey
2007-01-16 6:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] Tunable structure and registration routines Nadia.Derbey
2007-01-25 0:32 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-25 16:26 ` Nadia Derbey
2007-01-25 16:34 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-25 17:01 ` Nadia Derbey
2007-01-16 6:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] auto_tuning activation Nadia.Derbey
2007-01-16 6:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] tunables associated kobjects Nadia.Derbey
2007-01-16 6:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] min and max kobjects Nadia.Derbey
2007-01-24 22:41 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-25 16:34 ` Nadia Derbey
2007-01-16 6:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] per namespace tunables Nadia.Derbey
2007-01-24 22:41 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-16 6:15 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] automatic tuning applied to some kernel components Nadia.Derbey
2007-01-22 19:56 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-23 14:40 ` Nadia Derbey
2007-02-07 21:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-09 12:27 ` Nadia Derbey
2007-02-09 18:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-13 9:06 ` Nadia Derbey
2007-02-13 10:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-15 7:07 ` Nadia Derbey
2007-02-15 7:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-15 8:25 ` Nadia Derbey [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-14 13:56 Al Boldi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45D418DC.5040605@bull.net \
--to=nadia.derbey@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox