From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932249AbXBSNnw (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:43:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932251AbXBSNnw (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:43:52 -0500 Received: from mail.station1.mxsweep.com ([212.147.136.149]:2993 "EHLO SCMF01.mxsweep.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932249AbXBSNnv (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:43:51 -0500 Message-ID: <45D9A91D.9090707@draigBrady.com> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:41:49 +0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjan van de Ven CC: Phy Prabab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Question about setting affinity in 2.4 References: <2fe399760702181802q39e75b42iea7f80124506f169@mail.gmail.com> <1171891986.3531.34.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1171891986.3531.34.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mlf-Version: 5.0.2.8415 X-Mlf-UniqueId: o200702191345290225537 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: > sched_setaffinity takes 3 not 2 parameters. Yep the interface changed 3 times, hence it's probably better using the syscall directly. Search my notes for sched_setaffinity here: http://www.pixelbeat.org/programming/c_c++_notes.html Pádraig.