From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965223AbXBTQCx (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:02:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965234AbXBTQCw (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:02:52 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:44219 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965223AbXBTQCv (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:02:51 -0500 Message-ID: <45DB1BA9.20501@garzik.org> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:02:49 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Hancock CC: linux-kernel , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Allen Martin Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_nv: delay on switching between NCQ and non-NCQ commands References: <45DA43F6.80201@shaw.ca> In-Reply-To: <45DA43F6.80201@shaw.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.7 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robert Hancock wrote: > This patch appears to solve some problems with commands timing out in > cases where an NCQ command is immediately followed by a non-NCQ command > (or possibly vice versa). This is a rather ugly solution, but until we > know more about why this is needed, this is about all we can do. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock applied