From: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 17/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: avoid having a bad selector in %gs during context switch
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:25:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45DCD4D0.2000101@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200702212310.02218.ak@suse.de>
Andi Kleen wrote:
>> /*
>> + * Temporary hack: zero gs now that we've saved it so that Xen
>> + * doesn't try to reload the old value after changing the GDT
>> + * during the context switch. This can go away once Xen has
>> + * been taught to only reload %gs when it absolutely must.
>> + */
>> + loadsegment(gs, 0);
>>
>
> Sorry, but i don't really want that unconditionally in the context switch.
> Adding a paravirt ops for it would be also ugly. Can Xen be fixed?
>
I agree with that, but especially because this is not even the right
place to save and clear gs; when userspace uses an LDT based %gs, you
need to do this all the way back in mmu_context.h before you switch the
LDT out. We have the same bug, but I was loathe to try to fix it yet,
since it could mean some strange code movement. The awkward bit is that
switch_mm doesn't have the pointer to the previous task, only it's mm,
so there is no place to save gs. Perhaps it is time to move the LDT
switch into switch_to instead of switch_mm? It's not like there are
different per-process LDTs in the fixmap or something, which I could see
as a valid reason to associate this with the mm switch. But all process
LDTs are global, so there isn't an issue.
And I noticed this martian hanging out in mmu_context.h:
#define deactivate_mm(tsk, mm) \
asm("movl %0,%%gs": :"r" (0));
Zach
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-21 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070221205254.169835700@goop.org>
[not found] ` <20070221205323.770169136@goop.org>
2007-02-21 22:10 ` [patch 17/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: avoid having a bad selector in %gs during context switch Andi Kleen
2007-02-21 22:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-02-21 22:16 ` Keir Fraser
2007-02-21 23:25 ` Zachary Amsden [this message]
2007-02-21 23:29 ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[not found] ` <20070221205322.869165491@goop.org>
2007-02-21 22:15 ` [patch 05/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: Add pagetable accessors to pack and unpack pagetable entries Andi Kleen
2007-02-21 22:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-02-21 23:20 ` Rusty Russell
2007-02-21 23:27 ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[not found] ` <20070221205323.842917348@goop.org>
2007-02-22 3:10 ` [patch 18/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: Some generic early printk & boot console fixups Andrew Morton
2007-02-22 5:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-02-22 8:33 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45DCD4D0.2000101@vmware.com \
--to=zach@vmware.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox