From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932962AbXBYI6I (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Feb 2007 03:58:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933681AbXBYI6I (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Feb 2007 03:58:08 -0500 Received: from il.qumranet.com ([82.166.9.18]:44054 "EHLO il.qumranet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932962AbXBYI6H (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Feb 2007 03:58:07 -0500 Message-ID: <45E14F9D.3050502@qumranet.com> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:58:05 +0200 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kvm-devel , linux-kernel Subject: PIO port width on various archs? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm changing the kvm userspace interface to be more friendly to other archs. One issue is the PIO port size. x86 uses 16 bits to hold the port size (64K ports). Is that an issue for other archs? I guess I could change it to __u32, but it's better to know what various architectures actually require. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function