From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751883AbXB0RVR (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:21:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932691AbXB0RVR (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:21:17 -0500 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:38947 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751692AbXB0RVQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:21:16 -0500 Message-ID: <45E46889.9090801@goop.org> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:21:13 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Bottomley CC: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Chris Wright , Zachary Amsden , Rusty Russell , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 09/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: remove HAVE_ARCH_MM_LIFETIME, define no-op architecture implementations References: <20070227081337.434798469@goop.org> <20070227081632.356636957@goop.org> <1172589358.3408.2.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> In-Reply-To: <1172589358.3408.2.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 00:13 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >> plain text document attachment (kill-HAVE_ARCH_MM_LIFETIME.patch) >> akpm: >> >>> Can we lose __HAVE_ARCH_MM_LIFETIME? Just define these (preferably in C, >>> not in cpp) in the appropriate include/asm-foo/ files? >>> >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge >> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org >> >> --- >> include/asm-alpha/mmu_context.h | 9 +++++++++ >> include/asm-arm/mmu_context.h | 9 +++++++++ >> include/asm-arm26/mmu_context.h | 9 +++++++++ >> include/asm-avr32/mmu_context.h | 9 +++++++++ >> include/asm-cris/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-frv/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-h8300/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-i386/mmu_context.h | 2 +- >> include/asm-i386/paravirt.h | 18 +++++++++++++++--- >> include/asm-ia64/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-m32r/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-m68k/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-m68knommu/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-mips/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-parisc/mmu_context.h | 9 +++++++++ >> include/asm-powerpc/mmu_context.h | 10 ++++++++++ >> include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h | 9 +++++++++ >> include/asm-s390/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-sh/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-sh64/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-sparc/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-sparc64/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-um/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-v850/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-x86_64/mmu_context.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/asm-xtensa/mmu_context.h | 9 +++++++++ >> include/linux/sched.h | 6 ------ >> mm/mmap.c | 1 + >> 28 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> > > Wouldn't it be a lot easier to do this via asm-generic? > You mean add the two stubs to asm-generic/mmu_context.h, and then include that in all these files? That would be cleaner, but it wouldn't remove the need to touch all these files, would it? J