From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992727AbXCBXO3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:14:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992725AbXCBXO3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:14:29 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:54573 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992720AbXCBXO2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:14:28 -0500 Message-ID: <45E8AFD2.3020904@garzik.org> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:14:26 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan CC: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: dev_config does not need ap and adev passing References: <20070302005615.4f53acb8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20070302005615.4f53acb8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.8 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan wrote: > It used to be impossible to get from ata_device to ata_port but that is > no longer true. Various methods have been cleaned up over time but > dev_config still takes both and most users don't need both anyway. Tidy > this one up > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox applied to #upstream (2.6.22), since its not a bugfix