From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: userspace pagecache management tool
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 19:01:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45EA0C3D.1010001@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070303145221.2a42cc0f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:25:30 -0500 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> backup program
>
> A suitable policy for a backup program would probably be to invalidate any
> output file(s) and to invalidate those pages of the input files which were
> not in cache when the backup program first opened those files. That way
> the backup program will have no effect on the cache state, except for the
> race situation where someone read an uncached file while the backup program
> was reading from it too.
The use-once policy we have in the kernel should work
perfectly fine for backups. All we need to do is
actually honor the accessed bit on active page cache
pages, instead of flushing them onto the inactive
list.
What am I overlooking?
> This can be added in an hour or two with no kernel changes (use mincore).
mincore only works for mmaped areas, we'd need an fincore
to work with file handles.
--
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world, and those who believe it already is. Each group
calls the other unpatriotic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-04 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-03 20:29 userspace pagecache management tool Andrew Morton
2007-03-03 20:40 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-03 21:12 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-03 21:30 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-03 21:41 ` bert hubert
2007-03-03 22:14 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-03 22:19 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-03 22:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-03 22:28 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-03 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-03 22:56 ` Erik Andersen
2007-03-03 23:01 ` bert hubert
2007-03-03 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-06 12:10 ` Pádraig Brady
2007-03-06 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-06 21:44 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-07 11:39 ` Pádraig Brady
2007-03-07 18:50 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-08 7:59 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-03-08 8:12 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-03 22:07 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-03 22:25 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-03 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-03 22:52 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-04 0:01 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2007-03-04 1:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-04 1:23 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-04 1:49 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-04 1:56 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-04 12:07 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-04 14:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-03-04 16:01 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-03 22:58 ` Ray Lee
2007-03-03 23:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-04 1:02 ` Ray Lee
2007-03-04 1:21 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-04 0:14 ` Eric St-Laurent
2007-03-04 1:10 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-04 1:39 ` Rik van Riel
2007-03-04 1:16 ` Lee Revell
2007-03-04 1:39 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-04 2:35 ` Lee Revell
2007-03-04 4:35 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-05 11:02 ` Pádraig Brady
2007-03-05 11:12 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45EA0C3D.1010001@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox