From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966013AbXCFSsQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:48:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966008AbXCFSsP (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:48:15 -0500 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:56070 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966013AbXCFSsO (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:48:14 -0500 Message-ID: <45EDB76A.4050604@goop.org> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:48:10 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zachary Amsden CC: Ingo Molnar , Rusty Russell , virtualization , Andrew Morton , Roland McGrath , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential References: <20070305120631.GA14105@elte.hu> <1173101297.26165.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1173142644.4644.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45ECBDDC.8080708@vmware.com> <45ECC076.9050209@goop.org> <20070306073511.GA3938@elte.hu> <45ED1B64.9040104@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <45ED1B64.9040104@vmware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Zachary Amsden wrote: > Yes, I don't have a problem with your patch, I just wish I had been > cc'd on it. Fixing this is rather tricky, but I believe no strange > build magic is required, it can be done in kernel init code. Still > building my SUSE 9.0 guest to test. SUSE 9.0 is one of those that > requires COMPAT_VDSO, yes? Where do we stand on VDSO reloc? Are you turning this into a proper patch, or shall I have a look at it? J