From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932830AbXCGGvz (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 01:51:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932839AbXCGGvz (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 01:51:55 -0500 Received: from ausmtp04.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.152]:56775 "EHLO ausmtp04.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932830AbXCGGvy (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 01:51:54 -0500 Message-ID: <45EE6112.7050702@in.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:22:02 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@in.ibm.com Organization: IBM User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Emelianov CC: Andrew Morton , Paul Menage , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , devel@openvz.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , containers@lists.osdl.org, Kirill Korotaev Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Resource controllers based on process containers References: <45ED7DEC.7010403@sw.ru> In-Reply-To: <45ED7DEC.7010403@sw.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Emelianov wrote: > This patchset adds RSS, accounting and control and > limiting the number of tasks and files within container. > > Based on top of Paul Menage's container subsystem v7 > > RSS controller includes per-container RSS accounter, > reclamation and OOM killer. It behaves like standalone > machine - when container runs out of resources it tries > to reclaim some pages and if it doesn't succeed in it > kills some task which mm_struct belongs to container in > question. > > Num tasks and files containers are very simple and > self-descriptive from code. > > As discussed before when a task moves from one container > to another no resources follow it - they keep holding the > container they were allocated in. > I have one problem with the patchset, I cannot compile the patches individually and some of the code is hard to read as it depends on functions from future patches. Patch 2, 3 and 4 fail to compile without patch 5 applied. Patch 1 failed to apply with a reject in kernel/Makefile I applied it on top of 2.6.20 with all of Paul Menage's patches (all 7). -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL