From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992474AbXCGWJW (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:09:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992473AbXCGWJW (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:09:22 -0500 Received: from pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net ([81.228.11.98]:46386 "EHLO pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992474AbXCGWJU (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:09:20 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 4201 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:09:20 EST Message-ID: <45EF275E.4060300@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:58:06 +0100 From: johan henriksson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Ebbert CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Radeon xpress 200m and radeonfb kinda work References: <45ECB2D0.3080205@telia.com> <45EEEBC9.1010002@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <45EEEBC9.1010002@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chuck Ebbert wrote: > Johan Henriksson wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I have gotten the radeon xpress 200m (the version without dedicated > > vmem) to work with radeonfb. The attached patch (against > > linux-2.6.20.1) works for me. Since I don't have any docs for the > > card I am unsure if the patch is 100% correct. Can someone else > > with a 200m try it out? (I have tested it by enabling fbcon and > > radeonfb in the kernel and added "video=radeonfb" to lilo. This > > gave me a nice 1280x800 console :) ) > > > > Works for me as a module on Compaq V2000 notebook. 160x48 is a bit > small, but looks very clear and crisp. > > Is there anything else needed to get this merged? > As you can see in the patch I have disabled "Dynamic Clock PM" since it makes my card freak out (Don't know why :( ). Is there a reason why the "default_dynclk" parameter only is available when radeonfb is built as a module or should it be added to radeonfb_setup? /Johan Henriksson