From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1767228AbXCIMuM (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:50:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1767230AbXCIMuL (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:50:11 -0500 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.182]:12148 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767227AbXCIMuJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:50:09 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Lc6P12bRbV8U2WXTnsNhwqnV09NvsuolMWVRhBp2r3bmt1kB5SHHDIARRy3iR1yN97GxxwrEqPnZ3TVhZ6z4V6RMM4ePbQXO6THwRre+i137jC3zAnnX+Y0VysFWeGEFaxaPwiBvcdhKqAZ/aomPbLChy9rHCLKyxMeIlKrmbVU= Message-ID: <45F157FF.50801@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:50:07 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061220) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATA] Failed to set xfermode on LITE-ON LTR-48246S References: <20070227135838.GA4328@titan.lahn.de> <45EB9822.40300@gmail.com> <20070305103840.GA4381@titan.lahn.de> <45EC3B3F.7020509@gmail.com> <20070306092339.GA3803@titan.lahn.de> In-Reply-To: <20070306092339.GA3803@titan.lahn.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: > Hello Tejun! > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:07AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:10:10PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >>>> * Does applying the attached patch over unpatched 2.6.20.1 fix the problem? >>> Yes, it seems to fix it. (testes on top of the first patch mentioned >>> above, but witheout the second one.). >>> If I should test it as the sole patche, just mail me again please. >> Yeap, please test it on top of vanilla kernel to verify that the patch >> proper fixes the problem. > > Yes, applying only this patch does fix the problem. > Thank you for your support. Okay, it seems we'll have to default to polling SETXFER. I'll forward it upstream soon. Thanks. -- tejun