From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1767241AbXCIMyT (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:54:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1767240AbXCIMyT (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:54:19 -0500 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.225]:6036 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767236AbXCIMyR (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:54:17 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PKtIxBqcLgNjjdUNnXkPJTkI2KNDggIkRVpxKBagC4evnvV5Wse1jUG46aau3zp3jISKFz8X25uBkUWQAi9J7IkPHCWw4qIYhpunXlEzgWeTW2QL4W+ptL5hiadY9UQKPwryhjHFlVakNmM+tsaWbfcUtNc5xugLjyAj2qP26Dg= Message-ID: <45F158F2.9040907@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:54:10 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061220) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Randy Dunlap CC: Sergei Shtylyov , Greg KH , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1: PCI=n: drivers/net/3c59x.c compile error References: <20070111222627.66bb75ab.akpm@osdl.org> <20070124135354.GI17836@stusta.de> <45B76946.1070009@ru.mvista.com> <45D756D7.4060106@ru.mvista.com> <45D75853.1060607@ru.mvista.com> <45E2DF13.9010200@ru.mvista.com> <20070226092644.aea76b37.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20070226211401.GC3810@kroah.com> <45ED9390.3000308@ru.mvista.com> <20070306084751.b82a7b84.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20070306084751.b82a7b84.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Erm, before I do that, could somebody explain what >> >> #define HAVE_PCI_REQ_REGIONS 2 >> >> accompanying their declaration is for? I have't found any references to it in >> the source. Should I duplicate it for CONFIG_PCI=n case (I guess not)? > > I wouldn't since it's not used anywhere, but maybe Tejun could comment > on it... This is the first time I see that macro. There is no user in the whole source. I think the best way is to just kill it. Thanks. -- tejun