From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752637AbXCIVkv (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:40:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752760AbXCIVkv (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:40:51 -0500 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:54600 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752637AbXCIVku (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:40:50 -0500 Message-ID: <45F1D45F.4020000@goop.org> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:40:47 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Zachary Amsden , Thomas Gleixner , john stultz , akpm@linux-foundation.org, LKML , Rusty Russell , Andi Kleen , Chris Wright , Alan Cox Subject: Re: ABI coupling to hypervisors via CONFIG_PARAVIRT References: <20070309180230.GA17988@elte.hu> <20070309192420.GA27747@elte.hu> <20070309201257.GA5761@elte.hu> <20070309213607.GA16796@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20070309213607.GA16796@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > but ... maybe because VMI is so lowlevel and covers /all/ of x86 today, > it will always be able to emulate whatever different concept we can come > up with? Do we really know this absolutely sure? > Why don't you make a specific proposal, and we'll work out the details. J