public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@sw.ru>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@us.ibm.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] kernel/pid.c pid allocation wierdness
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:30:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F7A4B3.5040005@sw.ru> (raw)

Hi.

I'm looking at how alloc_pid() works and can't understand
one (simple/stupid) thing.

It first kmem_cache_alloc()-s a strct pid, then calls
alloc_pidmap() and at the end it taks a global pidmap_lock()
to add new pid to hash.

The question is - why does alloc_pidmap() use at least
two atomic ops and potentially loop to find a zero bit
in pidmap? Why not call alloc_pidmap() under pidmap_lock
and find zero pid in pidmap w/o any loops and atomics?

The same is for free_pid(). Do I miss something?

Thank,
Pavel

             reply	other threads:[~2007-03-14  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-14  7:30 Pavel Emelianov [this message]
2007-03-14 14:12 ` [RFC] kernel/pid.c pid allocation wierdness Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-14 15:03   ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-14 16:54     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-15 20:26       ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-16 13:04         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-16 19:46           ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-16 21:18             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-14 15:33   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-16 10:57     ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-03-16 11:37       ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-16 11:58         ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-03-16 11:40       ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-03-14 14:43 ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45F7A4B3.5040005@sw.ru \
    --to=xemul@sw.ru \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox