public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 - Take 2
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:50:57 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F97971.7080000@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070314181508.GB12994@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>>>symbolic links perhaps? In that case i'd also introduce a common 
>>>naming scheme: x86_early_printk.c - to make sure we know it right 
>>>away that those files are bi-arch.
>>
>>Hey, I know! This is a radical idea, but what if we put the name at 
>>the head of the file, and called it
>>
>>	arch/x86/kernel/early_printk.c
>>
>>instead? Then we could teach each of i386 and x86-64 to include it 
>>from that area, and we could put other shared files under the same 
>>directory hierarchy so that it would be easy to see which ones are 
>>shared?
> 
> 
> that is nice too, but it has some disadvantages as well in practice. For 
> example i often want to see 'everything' that belongs to an arch in just 
> one subdirectory. That way one can grep it for example, instead of 
> having to grep two separate places. Symlinks would be fine for that, but 
> an explicit split not really i think - unless we can get some really 
> significant chunk of code into that hierarchy, so that it makes 
> functional /sense/ to look at it in isolation.
> 
> with the prefix suggestion we can keep these 'shared' files merged in a 
> single, main functional tree (x86_64), but still have them marked in the 
> VFS as being shared. But ... either way is fine to me - no strong 
> feelings, really.

You could do both. Have the x86 directory that Linus suggests for shared
files, then have the build system generate the symlinks for you.

Could have arch/x86_64/kernel/common arch/x86_64/mm/common etc. symlinks.
that point to arch/x86/kernel, arch/x86/mm etc.

This way you know exactly which files are shared and which are not, which
is basically impossible without a grep currently. You also get to do a
single grep of all arch code. Best of both worlds? Or do I miss something?

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-15 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-14  5:08 [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 - Take 2 Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 01/18] toplevel Kconfig changes Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 02/18] x86 Makefile changes Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 03/18] acpi Makefile updates Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 04/18] make the cpu/cpufreq/Makefile Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 05/18] mv kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 06/18] mv kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.h Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 07/18] mv kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-lib.c Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 08/18] create x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 09/18] create x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/Makefile Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 10/18] make the kernel Makefile Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 11/18] rm include pointer to x86_64 early_printk.c Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 12/18] rm include pointer to x86_64 tsc_sync.c Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 13/18] create x86/lib/Makefile Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 14/18] rm include pointer to i386 msr-on-cpu.c file Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 15/18] create x86/mm/Makefile Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 16/18] kconfig for oprofile Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 17/18] create x86/oprofile/Makefile Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  5:08 ` [PATCH 18/18] Straight file moves Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14 15:44   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-14 16:11     ` Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14  8:00 ` [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 - Take 2 Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-14 16:52   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-14 10:36 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-14  9:48   ` sujay g
2007-03-14 12:35   ` Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14 13:05     ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-14 13:36       ` Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14 18:47         ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-14 18:57           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-14 12:53   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-14 13:33     ` Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14 13:41       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-14 14:46         ` Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14 16:33           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-14 17:39             ` Steven Rostedt
2007-03-14 17:51               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-14 16:49         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-14 18:15           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-15 16:50             ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-03-15 17:26               ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-14 15:54     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-14 18:09       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-14 18:27         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-14 19:59           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-14 20:07             ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-14 20:19               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-14 20:34                 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-14 20:11             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-14 20:21               ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-14 21:34                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-15 15:50       ` Martin Bligh
2007-03-15 15:59         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-15 16:06           ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-15 16:23             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-15 16:47             ` Steven Rostedt
2007-03-15 16:57               ` Steven Rostedt
2007-03-15 17:01                 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-15 17:21                   ` Steven Rostedt
2007-03-16  4:28               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-16 11:44                 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-16 20:15                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-16 20:25                     ` Martin Bligh
2007-03-16 20:48                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-16 20:53                         ` David Miller
2007-03-16 20:56                           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-16 20:58                             ` David Miller
2007-03-16 20:59                         ` Martin Bligh
2007-03-16 21:02                           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-16 21:51                             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-19 14:27                           ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-03-16 20:47                     ` David Miller
2007-03-16 20:52                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-16 20:55                         ` David Miller
2007-03-16 20:59                           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-16 20:59                     ` Dave Hansen
2007-03-18 23:10                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-19 11:08                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-15 20:02           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-14 15:49   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-14 18:40   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-16  4:07 ` Kasper Sandberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45F97971.7080000@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=glommer@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox