From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751308AbXCOTQB (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:16:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751600AbXCOTQB (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:16:01 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:45226 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750878AbXCOTQA (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:16:00 -0400 Message-ID: <45F99B6F.9000604@goop.org> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:15:59 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, eranian@hpl.hp.com, rdunlap@xenotime.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation References: <45F5FA97.8070705@goop.org> <20070315110805.262e1fa3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070315110805.262e1fa3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > Hopeless, sorry. It's probably time to start thinking about raising x86 > patches against the x86 tree (at least). > You mean this conflicts heavily with your and/or andi's tree? J