From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965640AbXCPQzm (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:55:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965641AbXCPQzm (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:55:42 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:36749 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965640AbXCPQzl (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:55:41 -0400 Message-ID: <45FACC0D.3050103@goop.org> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:55:41 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Chris Wright , Zachary Amsden , Rusty Russell , Jens Axboe , Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [patch 00/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface References: <20070301232443.195603797@goop.org> <20070316084251.GA23174@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20070316084251.GA23174@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > >> * virtual block device (blockfront) >> * virtual network device (netfront) >> > > note, these drivers should be submitted through the proper block drivers > and network drivers review process - not via the x86_64 tree. > Yes; who should look at them? I posted netfront to net-dev, and Stephen Hemminger commented on it on the last repost, but I'd love them to get more scrutiny. Obviously they're not actually useful without Xen (and vice-versa), so there's not much point in committing them separately. J