From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933510AbXCSBHU (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:07:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964919AbXCSBHU (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:07:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:54862 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933510AbXCSBHS (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:07:18 -0400 Message-ID: <45FDE202.80807@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:06:10 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Chris Wright , Rusty Russell , Andi Kleen , Glauber de Oliveira Costa , Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH take3 00/20] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 - Take 3 References: <20070315051337.488091591@goodmis.org> <20070316102933.GB4185@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20070316102933.GB4185@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Steven Rostedt wrote: > >> Once again here's an attempt to put the shared files of x86_64 and >> i386 into a separate directory. > > what do you think about the idea i suggested: to do an x32_/x64_ prefix > (or _32/_64 postfix), in a brute-force way, _right away_. I.e. do not > have any overlap of having both arch/i386/ and arch/x86_64/ and > arch/x86/ - move everything to arch/x86/ right now. No, no, please don't do that. It would make backporting patches for stable kernels a real pain. Moving only the common files is the right way to go for a first cut...