From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/fred: Fix the FRED RSP0 MSR out of sync with its per CPU cache
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 14:31:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45d4edfd-d3d9-4115-9ec3-947630b06ce0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6bc203b-b1e2-4da1-b1f4-1a61bb35d931@citrix.com>
On 1/8/25 13:10, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/01/2025 8:14 pm, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 1/7/25 18:36, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
>>> + * Another option is to leave the FRED RSP0 MSR as-is, because the RESET
>>> + * state of FRED MSRs is zero and INIT does not change the value of the
>>> + * FRED MSRs in a CPU offline/online cycle. But it doesn't seem safe to
>>> + * depend on the properties of INIT as that's way too many things that
>>> + * could cause bugs.
>> Wouldn't that also open us up to kexec problems? If the last kernel
>> (maybe not even Linux) left RSP0 set, then the current kernel might
>> eventually try to run userspace with the old kernel's RSP0 value.
> That's why the init code needs to write every control MSR, even if it's
> filling in 0 because it doesn't want to use the feature.
>
> The job of the init code is to go from an unknown state into a good
> state, not from the INIT/#RESET state.
Right, so I think the quoted "Another option..." comment needs to get
zapped. Because it's not really another option. Discussing alternatives
is better left for changelogs anyway, not code comments.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-08 2:36 [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/fred: Fix the FRED RSP0 MSR out of sync with its per CPU cache Xin Li (Intel)
2025-01-08 3:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-01-08 20:14 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-08 21:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-01-08 22:31 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2025-01-08 23:32 ` Xin Li
2025-01-09 9:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-01-09 18:48 ` Xin Li
2025-01-08 23:04 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-08 23:32 ` Xin Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45d4edfd-d3d9-4115-9ec3-947630b06ce0@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox