The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/fred: Fix the FRED RSP0 MSR out of sync with its per CPU cache
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 14:31:19 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45d4edfd-d3d9-4115-9ec3-947630b06ce0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6bc203b-b1e2-4da1-b1f4-1a61bb35d931@citrix.com>

On 1/8/25 13:10, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/01/2025 8:14 pm, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 1/7/25 18:36, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
>>> +	 * Another option is to leave the FRED RSP0 MSR as-is, because the RESET
>>> +	 * state of FRED MSRs is zero and INIT does not change the value of the
>>> +	 * FRED MSRs in a CPU offline/online cycle.  But it doesn't seem safe to
>>> +	 * depend on the properties of INIT as that's way too many things that
>>> +	 * could cause bugs.
>> Wouldn't that also open us up to kexec problems? If the last kernel
>> (maybe not even Linux) left RSP0 set, then the current kernel might
>> eventually try to run userspace with the old kernel's RSP0 value.
> That's why the init code needs to write every control MSR, even if it's
> filling in 0 because it doesn't want to use the feature.
> 
> The job of the init code is to go from an unknown state into a good
> state, not from the INIT/#RESET state.

Right, so I think the quoted "Another option..." comment needs to get
zapped. Because it's not really another option. Discussing alternatives
is better left for changelogs anyway, not code comments.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-08 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-08  2:36 [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/fred: Fix the FRED RSP0 MSR out of sync with its per CPU cache Xin Li (Intel)
2025-01-08  3:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-01-08 20:14 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-08 21:10   ` Andrew Cooper
2025-01-08 22:31     ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2025-01-08 23:32       ` Xin Li
2025-01-09  9:46   ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-01-09 18:48     ` Xin Li
2025-01-08 23:04 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-08 23:32   ` Xin Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45d4edfd-d3d9-4115-9ec3-947630b06ce0@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox