From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>,
Jyri Sarha <jyri.sarha@iki.fi>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: DRI Development List <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>, Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>,
Randolph Sapp <rs@ti.com>, Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>,
Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com>,
Jai Luthra <j-luthra@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: display: ti,am65x-dss: Add OLDI properties for AM625 DSS
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 10:15:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45e1533a-5f97-4262-b6ae-477f1f94aa8b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73f033cb-d890-426d-8b1a-f9c56456961d@linux.dev>
On 26/08/2024 09:32, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>
> On 7/21/24 21:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/07/2024 10:42, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
>>> The DSS in AM625 SoC has 2 OLDI TXes. Refer the OLDI schema to add the
>>> support for the OLDI TXes.
>>>
>>> The AM625 DSS VP1 (port@0) can connect and control 2 OLDI TXes, to use
>>> them in dual-link or cloned single-link OLDI modes. Add support for an
>>> additional endpoint under the port@0 to accurately depict the data flow
>>> path.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml | 135 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 135 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
>>> index 399d68986326..249597455d34 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
>>> @@ -91,6 +91,24 @@ properties:
>>> For AM625 DSS, the internal DPI output port node from video
>>> port 1.
>>> For AM62A7 DSS, the port is tied off inside the SoC.
>>> + properties:
>>> + endpoint@0:
>>> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/endpoint
>>> + description:
>>> + For AM625 DSS, VP Connection to OLDI0.
>>> + For AM65X DSS, OLDI output from the SoC.
>>> +
>>> + endpoint@1:
>>> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/endpoint
>>> + description:
>>> + For AM625 DSS, VP Connection to OLDI1.
>>
>> Eh, that's confusing. Why do you have graph to your children? Isn't this
>> entirely pointless?
>
> I am not sure I fully understand. The same display source video port can
> connect up to 2 OLDI TXes - hence 2 endpoints which connect to the OLDI
> that were described in the previous patch. The idea has been to
> accurately depict the connections of the hardware.
>
> What am I missing here?
You are missing the explanation: why do you need to represent internal
parts of a device with graph. Where does this endpoint point?
Provide some diagram showing the architecture, because either it is
wrong or I do not understand what hardware you want to represent here.
>
>
> side-note: I do realize, as I write this, that it has been quite a while
> since you reviewed, and that you may have, rightfully, lost context.
> I apologize for that.
>
>>
>>> +
>>> + anyOf:
>>> + - required:
>>> + - endpoint
>>> + - required:
>>> + - endpoint@0
>>> + - endpoint@1
>>>
>>> port@1:
>>> $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
>>> @@ -112,6 +130,23 @@ properties:
>>> Input memory (from main memory to dispc) bandwidth limit in
>>> bytes per second
>>>
>>> + oldi-txes:
>>> + type: object
>>> + additionalProperties: true
>>
>> Why? This looks wrong.
>
> This, I will admit, was a shot in the dark. The binding check asked me
> that I was missing either this or unevaluatedProperties. I tried to make
> sense of the two, but with little luck. Eventually, I went with this.
>
> I could change it to unevaluatedProperties if that is indeed correct. I
> could also use some comprehensive resource to understand this, if you
> have something to recommend. =)
This must be additionalProperties false. See example schema or writing
schema.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-26 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-16 8:42 [PATCH v3 0/4] drm/tidss: Add OLDI bridge support Aradhya Bhatia
2024-07-16 8:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: display: ti,am65x-dss: Re-indent the example Aradhya Bhatia
2024-07-16 8:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: display: ti: Add schema for AM625 OLDI Transmitter Aradhya Bhatia
2024-07-21 15:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-26 5:47 ` Aradhya Bhatia
2024-08-26 8:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-07-16 8:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: display: ti,am65x-dss: Add OLDI properties for AM625 DSS Aradhya Bhatia
2024-07-21 15:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-26 7:32 ` Aradhya Bhatia
2024-08-26 8:15 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2024-07-16 8:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/tidss: Add OLDI bridge support Aradhya Bhatia
2024-09-06 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Francesco Dolcini
2024-09-09 8:15 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2024-09-09 9:31 ` Aradhya Bhatia
2024-09-09 9:50 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2024-09-09 10:14 ` Aradhya Bhatia
2024-09-09 9:43 ` Max Krummenacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45e1533a-5f97-4262-b6ae-477f1f94aa8b@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com \
--cc=aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devarsht@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=francesco@dolcini.it \
--cc=j-choudhary@ti.com \
--cc=j-luthra@ti.com \
--cc=jyri.sarha@iki.fi \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=praneeth@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rs@ti.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox