From: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unneeded loop
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2021 11:47:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45f2ed02b8e5bb25057da6e7dc3e7c8713a1a2c0.1628329348.git.fabioaiuto83@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1628329348.git.fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
remove unneeded loop over multiple spatial streams
as phy only works on 1 spatial stream.
Removed commented code, removed condition
always satisfied, beautified comments.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c | 43 +++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c
index 17a5850183ad..af4d5ab1b382 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_HWConfig.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static void odm_RxPhyStatus92CSeries_Parsing(
struct odm_packet_info *pPktinfo
)
{
- u8 i, Max_spatial_stream;
+ u8 i;
s8 rx_pwr[4], rx_pwr_all = 0;
u8 EVM, PWDB_ALL = 0, PWDB_ALL_BT;
u8 RSSI, total_rssi = 0;
@@ -182,30 +182,27 @@ static void odm_RxPhyStatus92CSeries_Parsing(
pPhyInfo->rx_power = rx_pwr_all;
pPhyInfo->recv_signal_power = rx_pwr_all;
- {/* pMgntInfo->CustomerID != RT_CID_819x_Lenovo */
- /* */
- /* (3)EVM of HT rate */
- /* */
- Max_spatial_stream = 1; /* only spatial stream 1 makes sense */
-
- for (i = 0; i < Max_spatial_stream; i++) {
- /* Do not use shift operation like "rx_evmX >>= 1" because the compilor of free build environment */
- /* fill most significant bit to "zero" when doing shifting operation which may change a negative */
- /* value to positive one, then the dbm value (which is supposed to be negative) is not correct anymore. */
- EVM = odm_EVMdbToPercentage((pPhyStaRpt->stream_rxevm[i])); /* dbm */
-
- /* if (pPktinfo->bPacketMatchBSSID) */
- {
- if (i == ODM_RF_PATH_A) /* Fill value in RFD, Get the first spatial stream only */
- pPhyInfo->signal_quality = (u8)(EVM & 0xff);
-
- pPhyInfo->rx_mimo_signal_quality[i] = (u8)(EVM & 0xff);
- }
- }
- }
+ /*
+ * (3)EVM of HT rate
+ *
+ * Only spatial stream 1 makes sense
+ *
+ * Do not use shift operation like "rx_evmX >>= 1"
+ * because the compiler of free build environment
+ * fill most significant bit to "zero" when doing
+ * shifting operation which may change a negative
+ * value to positive one, then the dbm value (which
+ * is supposed to be negative) is not correct
+ * anymore.
+ */
+ EVM = odm_EVMdbToPercentage(pPhyStaRpt->stream_rxevm[0]); /* dbm */
+
+ /* Fill value in RFD, Get the first spatial stream only */
+ pPhyInfo->signal_quality = (u8)(EVM & 0xff);
+
+ pPhyInfo->rx_mimo_signal_quality[ODM_RF_PATH_A] = (u8)(EVM & 0xff);
ODM_ParsingCFO(pDM_Odm, pPktinfo, pPhyStaRpt->path_cfotail);
-
}
/* UI BSS List signal strength(in percentage), make it good looking, from 0~100. */
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-07 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-07 9:47 [PATCH 00/21] staging: rtl8723b: remove some code related to other chips Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:47 ` [PATCH 01/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove code related to unsupported MCS index values Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:47 ` Fabio Aiuto [this message]
2021-08-07 9:47 ` [PATCH 03/21] staging: rtl8723bs: do some code cleaning in modified function Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:47 ` [PATCH 04/21] staging: rtl8723bs: move function to file hal/odm_HWConfig.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:47 ` [PATCH 05/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove empty files Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:47 ` [PATCH 06/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove wrapping static function Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:47 ` [PATCH 07/21] staging: rtl8723bs: beautify function ODM_PhyStatusQuery() Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 08/21] staging: rtl8723bs: fix right side of condition Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 09/21] staging: rtl8723bs: clean driver from unused RF paths Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 10/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused macros Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 11/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused struct member Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 12/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove rf type branching (first patch) Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 13/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove rf type branching (second patch) Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 14/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove rf type branching (third patch) Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 15/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove rf type branching (fourth patch) Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 16/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused rtw_rf_config module param Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 17/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused macro in include/hal_data.h Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 18/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RF_*TX enum Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 19/21] staging: rtl8723bs: use MAX_RF_PATH_NUM as ceiling to rf path index Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 20/21] staging: rtl8723bs: fix tx power tables size Fabio Aiuto
2021-08-07 9:48 ` [PATCH 21/21] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused RF_*T*R enum Fabio Aiuto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45f2ed02b8e5bb25057da6e7dc3e7c8713a1a2c0.1628329348.git.fabioaiuto83@gmail.com \
--to=fabioaiuto83@gmail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox