From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] SLAB : Use num_possible_cpus() in enable_cpucache()
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:57:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4600D756.7070500@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4600D04B.6030305@cosmosbay.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 986 bytes --]
The existing comment in mm/slab.c is *perfect*, so I reproduce it :
/*
* CPU bound tasks (e.g. network routing) can exhibit cpu bound
* allocation behaviour: Most allocs on one cpu, most free operations
* on another cpu. For these cases, an efficient object passing between
* cpus is necessary. This is provided by a shared array. The array
* replaces Bonwick's magazine layer.
* On uniprocessor, it's functionally equivalent (but less efficient)
* to a larger limit. Thus disabled by default.
*/
As most shiped linux kernels are now compiled with CONFIG_SMP, there is no way
a preprocessor #if can detect if the machine is UP or SMP. Better to use
num_possible_cpus().
This means on UP we allocate a 'size=0 shared array', to be more efficient.
Another patch can later avoid the allocations of 'empty shared arrays', to
save some memory.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
[-- Attachment #2: slab_use_num_possible_cpus.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 398 bytes --]
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 57f7aa4..a69d0a5 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -3975,10 +3975,8 @@ static int enable_cpucache(struct kmem_c
* to a larger limit. Thus disabled by default.
*/
shared = 0;
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (cachep->buffer_size <= PAGE_SIZE)
+ if (cachep->buffer_size <= PAGE_SIZE && num_possible_cpus() > 1)
shared = 8;
-#endif
#if DEBUG
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-21 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-20 17:12 [RFC] SLAB : NUMA cache_free_alien() very expensive because of virt_to_slab(objp); nodeid = slabp->nodeid; Eric Dumazet
2007-03-20 19:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-20 21:32 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-20 22:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-21 0:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-21 6:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-21 6:57 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2007-03-21 7:21 ` [PATCH] SLAB : Dont allocate empty shared caches Eric Dumazet
2007-03-21 13:13 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-03-21 13:02 ` [PATCH] SLAB : Use num_possible_cpus() in enable_cpucache() Pekka Enberg
2007-03-21 18:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-21 7:03 ` [RFC] SLAB : NUMA cache_free_alien() very expensive because of virt_to_slab(objp); nodeid = slabp->nodeid; Christoph Lameter
2007-03-21 7:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-21 14:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-21 0:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-21 2:44 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-21 3:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-22 21:28 ` non-NUMA cache_free_alien() (was Re: [RFC] SLAB : NUMA cache_free_alien() very expensive because of virt_to_slab(objp); nodeid = slabp->nodeid;) Siddha, Suresh B
2007-03-22 22:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-22 22:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-22 22:40 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-03-22 22:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-23 1:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-23 14:14 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-23 14:12 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-02 22:55 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-04-03 0:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-03 0:31 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-04-09 18:01 ` [patch 1/2] x86_64: set node_possible_map at runtime Siddha, Suresh B
2007-04-09 18:07 ` [patch 2/2] slab, x86_64: skip cache_free_alien() on non NUMA Siddha, Suresh B
2007-04-09 20:23 ` [patch 1/2] x86_64: set node_possible_map at runtime Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4600D756.7070500@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=christoph@lameter.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox