Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-23T19:41:44Z

On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 19:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
>
> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
> of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
> possibly involved with one or more of these issues.
>
> Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering.
>
>
> Subject : system doesn't come out of suspend (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/22/391
> Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@mellanox.co.il>
> Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de>
> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Status : problem is being debugged
>
>
> Subject : first disk access after resume takes several minutes
> ('date' does not advance after resume from RAM, CONFIG_NO_HZ=n)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/8/117
> Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@mellanox.co.il>
> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Status : problem is being debugged

I lost track of Michaels various nested problems.

Michael can you please give a summary on _all_ entries in the
regressions list against Linus latest ?

Thanks,

tglx