From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C155C4332F for ; Mon, 23 May 2022 06:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230407AbiEWGMn (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2022 02:12:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43266 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236841AbiEWGML (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2022 02:12:11 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4051E3D2 for ; Sun, 22 May 2022 23:12:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1653286326; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zdXvbxe9TBvQlL5k5IXJSGdtX0v6lNlLaY17sAtSeoo=; b=FVPod1deVecH71AtwoZUY8pstKjlm3edVysChbJtpdktFCMq7fYIvQk1rKvDVsipsIVnkG D29e+68uwgl2wKbXDFQ9RAUMszZ8lbR2YVNq3ZX9I2qnYZ4pQAxW41CghcFsEk5t+pGCRj eIY/rmiH3/K2/fXAHlbD8BKlq16dFJQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-520--Ln86PXDPeW6kkOhtvqsjg-1; Mon, 23 May 2022 02:08:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -Ln86PXDPeW6kkOhtvqsjg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F6C7384F801; Mon, 23 May 2022 06:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.33.36.8]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42B2C27E97; Mon, 23 May 2022 06:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <165296980082.3595490.3561111064004493810.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Jeff Layton , Xiubo Li Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Steve French , Dominique Martinet , David Wysochanski , Ilya Dryomov , v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfs: ->cleanup() op is always given a rreq pointer now MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <460692.1653286129.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 07:08:49 +0100 Message-ID: <460693.1653286129@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.8 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Layton wrote: > Do we need free_subrequest? It looks like nothing defines it in this > series. These two patches add stuff that's used by stuff on my netfs-lib branch, but that's not going to be pushed this window, so I won't push these two patches for now. David