From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S934075AbXC0RyL@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S934075AbXC0RyL (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:54:11 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934080AbXC0RyK
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:54:10 -0400
Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:37616 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S934075AbXC0RyJ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:54:09 -0400
Message-ID: <46095A23.9090705@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:53:39 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jesse Huang <jesse@icplus.com.tw>, romieu@fr.zoreil.com
CC: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, penberg@cs.Helsinki.FI,
       akpm@osdl.org, dvrabel@cantab.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       netdev@vger.kernel.org, david@pleyades.net
Subject: Re: IP1000A: About IC Plus IP1000A Linux driver current status
References: <1156268234.3622.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060821231455.1ce9474d.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <001b01c7704f$4232a0d0$4964a8c0@icplus.com.tw>
In-Reply-To: <001b01c7704f$4232a0d0$4964a8c0@icplus.com.tw>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----)
X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.8 on srv5.dvmed.net summary:
	Content analysis details:   (-4.3 points, 5.0 required)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Jesse Huang wrote:
> Dear all:
> 
> Would someone tell me the current status of IP1000A Linux Driver?
> Would it be putted into Linux Kernel or not?

I forgot what the status of this was?  Didn't it need some cleanups?

Maybe Francois has a better memory than me.

	Jeff