From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933875AbXC1WRy (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:17:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933859AbXC1WRy (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:17:54 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:60841 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933875AbXC1WRx (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:17:53 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled eepro100 removal Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:17:59 -0400 Message-ID: <460AE997.90509@tmr.com> References: <20070325145810.GI16477@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mail.tmr.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061105 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 In-Reply-To: <20070325145810.GI16477@stusta.de> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > This patch contains the scheduled removal of the eepro100 driver. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk > > This keeps coming around, but I haven't seen an answer to the questions raised by Eric Piel or Kiszka. I do know that e100 didn't work on some IBM rackmount servers and eepro100 did, but since I'm no longer responsible for those machines I can't retest. Perhaps someone will be able to provide data points. IBM current offerings as of about three years ago, I had a few dozen of them at one time. -- Bill Davidsen "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot