From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933941AbXDBGsq (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 02:48:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933947AbXDBGsq (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 02:48:46 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:59983 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933941AbXDBGsp (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 02:48:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4610A73F.4030807@goop.org> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 23:48:31 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: Andrew Morton , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, lkml , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [patch 04/17] Add pagetable accessors to pack and unpack pagetable entries References: <20070402055652.610711908@goop.org> <20070402055704.278590661@goop.org> <200704020812.18320.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200704020812.18320.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: > What do the benchmarks say with CONFIG_PARAVIRT on native hardware > compared to !CONFIG_PARAVIRT. e.g. does lmbench suffer? > I haven't measured it, but I'll do some experiments. J