Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC] HID bus design overview.

[Li Yu <raise.sail@gmail.com>]

Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> No, please don't do that. As soon as there is a special driver written
> for a device that device's VID/PID should be added to generic HID
> blacklist. This way udev will load the proper driver right away and
> there will not be any flip-flopping of input devices. 
>   
Hi, I do not think that using blacklist in base driver for this purpose
is good idea. If so, we need modify source when each new HID device
driver come, that's so ugly. I think the blacklist only should be used
for those really broken/buggy hardware, not for these normal hardware
with extended feature.

Er, I also want to know what are drawbacks of "flip-flopping" ?


>  
>   
>> When user A remove this shadow driver, the USB/base driver should resume
>> work for this joystick, IOW, it should register back its input device again.
>>
>>     
>
> Why would we want to revert to using generic HID's implementation if we
> know that it is broken for that particular device???
>
>   

Well, many devices just only can not play its full feature, not broken.
so base driver still can work for us.