public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Sperry <dave_sperry@ieee.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Poor UDP performance using 2.6.21-rc5-rt5
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 04:17:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4610BC15.5030800@ieee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070402072111.GA21356@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Dave Sperry <dave_sperry@ieee.org> wrote:
>
>> I have a dual core Opteron machine that exhibits poor UDP performance 
>> (RT consumes more than 2X cpu) with the 2.6.21-rc5-rt5 as compared to 
>> 2.6.21-rc5. Top shows the IRQ handler consuming a lot of CPU.
>
> update: even with acpi_pm clocksource on vanilla i can reproduce similar 
> overhead using netperf.
>
> 	Ingo
>
Hi Ingo
I checked the clock source and in both the vanilla and rt cases and they 
were both acpi_pm

Here's the oprofile for my vanilla case:

 CPU: AMD64 processors, speed 2211.37 MHz (estimated)
Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Cycles outside of halt state) with a 
unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000
samples  %        image name               app name                 
symbol name
36264    18.2763  forcedeth.ko             forcedeth                
nv_nic_irq_optimized
25602    12.9029  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
spurious_interrupt
10067     5.0736  forcedeth.ko             forcedeth                
nv_start_xmit_optimized
8671      4.3700  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
unregister_kprobe
8270      4.1679  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
ctrl_dumpfamily
8042      4.0530  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
expand_files
5064      2.5521  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  kfree
4365      2.1999  libc-2.5.so              libc-2.5.so              
__sendto_nocancel
4067      2.0497  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
unix_bind
4010      2.0210  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  bad_gs
3929      1.9801  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
__alloc_skb
3859      1.9449  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
stack_segment
3107      1.5659  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
__find_get_block
2816      1.4192  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
vfs_create
2611      1.3159  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
ide_end_drive_cmd
2604      1.3124  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
ide_end_request
2560      1.2902  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
find_get_page
2458      1.2388  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
hrtimer_run_queues
2456      1.2378  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
get_wchan
2403      1.2111  forcedeth.ko             forcedeth                
nv_tx_done_optimized
2231      1.1244  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
do_sys_poll

Any thoughts?

Thanks
Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-02  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-01 19:15 Poor UDP performance using 2.6.21-rc5-rt5 Dave Sperry
2007-04-01 20:07 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2007-04-01 22:00   ` Dave Sperry
2007-04-02  5:55   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-02  6:30     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-02  7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-02  8:17   ` Dave Sperry [this message]
2007-04-02  9:37     ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-02 14:09 dave_sperry@ieee.org
2007-04-02 14:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-02 17:17 dave_sperry@ieee.org
2007-04-02 17:50 dave_sperry@ieee.org
2007-04-02 19:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-03  0:09   ` David Sperry
2007-04-03  6:43     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-03  8:51     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4610BC15.5030800@ieee.org \
    --to=dave_sperry@ieee.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox