From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965526AbXDBOse (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:48:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965528AbXDBOse (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:48:34 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:40162 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965526AbXDBOsd (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:48:33 -0400 Message-ID: <461117BB.5040705@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:48:27 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Ebbert , Jan Kara , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] UDF cleanup and fixes References: <20070306164447.GC3661@duck.suse.cz> <20070330045923.GA5528@dose.home.local> <460D51AA.2080307@redhat.com> <20070331094631.GA24220@thinkpad.home.local> In-Reply-To: <20070331094631.GA24220@thinkpad.home.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tino Keitel wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 14:06:34 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: >> Tino Keitel wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 17:44:47 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> the patches attached to six following emails implement some cleanup and >>>> fixes in the UDF code. The main two fixes are: >>>> 1) UDF now works correctly for files larger than 1GB. >>> Hi, >>> >>> I tried 2.6.20 with your patches and got the following behaviour: >>> >>> $ ls -la dvd.udf >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4699717632 Mar 29 15:36 dvd.udf >>> $ mount -o loop -t udf dvd.udf /media/udf/ >>> $ df /media/udf/ >>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on >>> /home/storage/dvd.udf >>> 4588506 -8584746354 8589334860 - /media/udf >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> $ ls -la /media/udf/ >>> total 4587521 >>> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 144 Mar 29 15:36 . >>> drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 1024 Mar 20 12:02 .. >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4697620480 Mar 29 15:57 bk_usr.tar >>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Mar 29 15:36 lost+found >>> >> Is that on a 32-bit machine? > > Yes, it's an Intel Core Duo. Well, it works for me on 32-bit as well, right up to 100% full. No problems at all...