From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: getting processor numbers
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:13:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4612D175.30604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070403141348.9bcdb13e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1905 bytes --]
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Did we mean to go off-list?
Oops, no, pressed the wrong button.
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> So I'd have thought that in general an application should be querying its
>>> present affinity mask - something like sched_getaffinity()? That fixes the
>>> CPU hotplug issues too, of course.
>> Does it really?
>>
>> My recollection is that the affinity masks of running processes is not
>> updated on hotplugging. Is this addressed?
>
> ah, yes, you're correct.
>
> Inside a cpuset:
>
> sched_setaffinity() is constrained to those CPUs which are in the
> cpuset.
>
> If a cpu if on/offlined we update each cpuset's cpu mask appropriately
> but we do not update all the tasks presently running in the cpuset.
>
> Outside a cpuset:
>
> sched_setaffinity() is constrained to all possible cpus
>
> We don't update each task's cpus_allowed when a CPU is removed.
>
>
> I think we trivially _could_ update each tasks's cpus_allowed mask when a
> CPU is removed, actually.
I think it has to be done. But that's not so trivial. What happens if
all the CPUs a process was supposed to be runnable on vanish.
Shouldn't, if no affinity mask is defined, new processors be added? I
agree that if the process has a defined affinity mask no new processors
should be added _automatically_.
>> If yes, sched_getaffinity is a solution until the NUMA topology
>> framework can provide something better. Even without a popcnt
>> instruction in the CPU (64-bit albeit) it's twice as fast as the the
>> stat() method proposed.
>
> I'm surprised - I'd have expected sched_getaffinity() to be vastly quicker
> that doing fileystem operations.
You mean because it's only a factor of two? Well, it's not once you
count the whole overhead.
--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 251 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-03 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-03 16:54 getting processor numbers Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:30 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-04-03 17:37 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:56 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2007-04-03 18:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 17:17 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:22 ` Alan Cox
2007-04-03 17:30 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 20:24 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-03 17:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 17:30 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:35 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 17:45 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:58 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 18:05 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 18:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 18:21 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:44 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-04-03 17:59 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 19:40 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-03 20:13 ` Ingo Oeser
2007-04-03 23:38 ` J.A. Magallón
2007-04-03 19:55 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 20:13 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-04-03 20:19 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 20:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-03 20:20 ` Nathan Lynch
2007-04-03 19:15 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-04-03 19:32 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-04 0:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-04 0:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-04 0:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-04 5:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-04 5:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-04 5:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-04 5:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-04 5:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-04 5:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-03 20:16 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <4612BB89.8040102@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20070403141348.9bcdb13e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-03 22:13 ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2007-04-03 22:48 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-03 23:00 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 23:23 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-03 23:54 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-04 2:55 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 8:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-04 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-04 8:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-04 10:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-04 2:58 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 3:04 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 2:52 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 2:04 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 6:47 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-04 7:02 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 14:51 ` Cliff Wickman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4612D175.30604@redhat.com \
--to=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox