public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com>
To: Andrej Picej <andrej.picej@norik.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Cc: Support Opensource <support.opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
	"linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] watchdog: da9062: Correct the timeout values
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 07:47:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46136729bb564aa6b9f332fa584b2575@dh-electronics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0b6a801-f911-3371-1067-479b66240bdc@norik.com>

From: Andrej Picej
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 8:29 AM
>>>> I measured the timeout values of my DA9061 chip. According to the
>>>> information in the data sheet the formula should be:
>>>>
>>>> timeout = 2.048 * 2^(regval - 1)
>>>>
>>>> But my measured values differ from that.
>>>> Accoring to my measured values the formula must be:
>>>>
>>>> timeout = 3.2 * 2^(regval - 1)
>>>>
>>>> Is there something wrong with my chip, or has anyone else noticed this as well?
>>>
>>> The driver assumes a static and well defined clock rate. Maybe that rate
>>> is different in your system (if that is possible) ?
>>>
>>> Guenter
>>
>> @Andrej
>> Do the values in the driver match what your chip does?
>>
> 
> Just did a quick test. The values in the driver match what the chip
> does. I checked multiple timeouts 16, 32, 65 and 131 seconds. The
> timeout triggers quite accurately.
> 
>> I have not changed anything. After power on, the chip behaves like this.
>> So I guess it either come from an OTP value or the wiring outside the chip.
>> Does anyone know what needs to be checked?
> 
> Can't help you here, sorry.
> 

Thanks anyway, so now I know it must be
problem with my DA9061 chip.

@Adam
Where can it come from?
Can you give we a hint what to check?


Thanks and best regards
Christoph

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-06  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-03 16:35 [RFC PATCH] watchdog: da9062: Correct the timeout values Christoph Niedermaier
2021-12-03 16:52 ` Guenter Roeck
     [not found]   ` <4bfb6ab512cd45ee81c55361525987b7@dh-electronics.com>
2021-12-06  7:29     ` Andrej Picej
2021-12-06  7:47       ` Christoph Niedermaier [this message]
2021-12-06 16:37         ` Adam Thomson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46136729bb564aa6b9f332fa584b2575@dh-electronics.com \
    --to=cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com \
    --cc=Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=andrej.picej@norik.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=support.opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox