From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992885AbXDDND5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:03:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992894AbXDDND5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:03:57 -0400 Received: from smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl ([213.51.130.200]:58363 "EHLO smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992885AbXDDND4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:03:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4613A1F1.2080007@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:02:41 +0200 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Hellwig CC: Rusty Russell , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: MODULE_MAINTAINER References: <46138B4C.2050409@gmail.com> <20070404123311.GA18552@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20070404123311.GA18552@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/04/2007 02:33 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:26:04PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote: >> Can we have a MODULE_MAINTAINER to complement MODULE_AUTHOR? > > #define MODULE_MAINTAINER(x) MODULE_AUTHOR(x), please. > MODULE_AUTHOR really has meant maintainer in practice for ages, and it's > the only actually relevant for users information we should store. Given modules with multiple authors, current and non-current, I believe having "modinfo -m" tell the user whom to contact is an avantage. Rene.