public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
Cc: Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Latest e1000 7.3.20 driver busted with 2.6.20.4
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:12:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <461406A0.2060401@wolfmountaingroup.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46140276.1050905@intel.com>

Kok, Auke wrote:

> Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
>> Kok, Auke wrote:
>>
>>> Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>>>
>>>> CC [M]  drivers/net/chelsio/mv88x201x.o
>>>>   CC [M]  drivers/net/chelsio/my3126.o
>>>>   LD [M]  drivers/net/chelsio/cxgb.o
>>>>   CC      drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.o
>>>> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c:1185:45: error: macro "INIT_WORK" 
>>>> passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2
>>>> ared (first use in this function)
>>>> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c:1184: error: (Each undeclared 
>>>> identifier is reported only once
>>>> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c:1184: error: for each function it 
>>>> appears in.)
>>>> make[3]: *** [drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.o] Error 1
>>>> make[2]: *** [drivers/net/e1000] Error 2
>>>> make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
>>>> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>>>
>>>
>>> this is hardly a thread for lkml as you're posting about out 
>>> out-of-tree driver.  This issue has also been fixed in 7.4.35 which 
>>> was released last week on e1000.sf.net. In the future, please post 
>>> this stuff to e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net where we discuss the 
>>> out-of-tree driver.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Auke
>>>
>> Thanks.  I'll download Intel's latest driver and test it.   I wasn't 
>> discussing the out of tree driver (why do you have a broken Linux out 
>> of tree driver, BTW?   If its for Linux, shouldn't it be updated here 
>> first) but the driver in 2.6.20.4 (which is missing support four 
>> additional chipsets). 
>
>
> Our hardware release schedule is not aligned with kernel releases, and 
> customers need to have a working (and tested) driver once the hardware 
> is released. We try to get the updates into the kernel as fast as we 
> can, but often meet resistance, as the two parties involved just have 
> different interests.
>
> Are you saying that the in-kernel driver in 2.6.20.4 is broken? That 
> is bizarre, and should never happen. It compiles fine for me here...
>
>
It's missing support for some of the newer cards.  Your sales folks 
shipped us some newer hardware with the improved e1000, so I will have 
to adapt the newer drivers to 2.4.20.4.   Sounds like you are on top of 
it and things will sync up eventually.  :-)

Jeff

      reply	other threads:[~2007-04-04 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-04 17:36 Latest e1000 7.3.20 driver busted with 2.6.20.4 Jeff V. Merkey
2007-04-04 19:31 ` Kok, Auke
2007-04-04 19:46   ` Jeff V. Merkey
2007-04-04 19:54     ` Kok, Auke
2007-04-04 20:12       ` Jeff V. Merkey [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=461406A0.2060401@wolfmountaingroup.com \
    --to=jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com \
    --cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox