From: "Markus Rechberger" <markus.rechberger@amd.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Andreas Herrmann" <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
"Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: limit mwait_idle to Intel CPUs
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:06:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46152CA4.9000601@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46152A04.1010009@zytor.com>
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>>
>> It is not equivalent. Usually users check /proc/cpuinfo for their
>> CPU features. Deleting that flag is kind of obfuscation.
>>
>> I guess some time ago people did not care about their "svm" or "vmx"
>> flags. Nowadays (e.g. with kvm) some people are quite happy
>> if one of those strings occurs in /proc/cpuinfo (and they are quite
>> disappointed if this feature was disabled by BIOS).
>>
>
> What you're saying is that you want it to appear in /proc/cpuinfo for
> marketing reasons even though it's not usable.
>
> The ones in /proc/cpuinfo are cooked values anyway; there is plenty of
> history to that effect.
>
> I would agree with Andi that if as far as Linux is concerned mwait is
> unusable on AMD Fam10 processors, then the CPU detection code should
> turn this bit off on AMD Fam10 processors.
>
please see:
http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/FAQ
"How can I tell if I have Intel VT or AMD-V?"
Markus
--
Markus Rechberger
Operating System Research Center
AMD Saxony LLC & Co. KG
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-05 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-05 14:00 [PATCH] x86: limit mwait_idle to Intel CPUs Andreas Herrmann
2007-04-05 14:24 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-05 14:44 ` Andreas Herrmann
2007-04-05 15:37 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-05 16:20 ` Andreas Herrmann
2007-04-05 16:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-05 17:06 ` Markus Rechberger [this message]
2007-04-05 17:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-05 21:12 ` aherrman
2007-04-05 21:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-05 17:05 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-05 14:46 ` Langsdorf, Mark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46152CA4.9000601@amd.com \
--to=markus.rechberger@amd.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox