From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [BISECT BUG] NFS v4 root not working after 6d972518b821 ("NFS: Add fs_context support.")
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 15:12:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <461540.1579273958@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200117144055.GB3215@pi3>
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> mount.nfs4 -o vers=4,nolock 192.168.1.10:/srv/nfs/odroidhc1 /new_root
Okay, it looks like the mount command makes two attempts at mounting.
Firstly, it does this:
> [ 22.938314] NFSOP 'source=192.168.1.10:/srv/nfs/odroidhc1'
> [ 22.942638] NFSOP 'nolock=(null)'
> [ 22.945772] NFSOP 'vers=4.2'
> [ 22.948660] NFSOP 'addr=192.168.1.10'
> [ 22.952350] NFSOP 'clientaddr=192.168.1.12'
> [ 22.956831] NFS4: Couldn't follow remote path
Which accepts the "vers=4.2" parameter as there's no check that that is
actually valid given the configuration, but then fails later. Secondly, it
does this:
> [ 22.971001] NFSOP 'source=192.168.1.10:/srv/nfs/odroidhc1'
> [ 22.975217] NFSOP 'nolock=(null)'
> [ 22.978444] NFSOP 'vers=4'
> [ 22.981265] NFSOP 'minorversion=1'
> [ 22.984513] NFS: Value for 'minorversion' out of range
> mount.nfs4: Numerical result out of range
which fails because of the minorversion=1 specification, where the kernel
config didn't enable NFS_V4_1.
It looks like it ought to have failed prior to these patches in the same way:
case Opt_minorversion:
if (nfs_get_option_ul(args, &option))
goto out_invalid_value;
if (option > NFS4_MAX_MINOR_VERSION)
goto out_invalid_value;
mnt->minorversion = option;
break;
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-17 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-16 11:33 [BISECT BUG] NFS v4 root not working after 6d972518b821 ("NFS: Add fs_context support.") Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-01-17 0:49 ` Scott Mayhew
2020-01-17 11:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-01-17 12:54 ` David Howells
2020-01-17 13:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-01-17 14:08 ` David Howells
2020-01-17 14:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-01-17 14:20 ` David Howells
2020-01-17 14:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-01-17 15:12 ` David Howells [this message]
2020-01-17 15:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-17 15:32 ` Scott Mayhew
2020-01-17 15:44 ` David Howells
2020-01-17 15:48 ` [PATCH] nfs: Return EINVAL rather than ERANGE for mount parse errors David Howells
2020-01-17 15:55 ` [PATCH v2] " David Howells
2020-01-17 16:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-01-17 17:18 ` David Howells
2020-01-17 20:21 ` Schumaker, Anna
2020-01-17 21:12 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=461540.1579273958@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smayhew@redhat.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox