From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc6] [netfilter] early_drop imrovement
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 17:08:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4616626C.9020100@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4616203A.80203@sw.ru>
Vasily Averin wrote:
> No, I've not investigated this scenario. It looks like you are right and my
> patch can leads to a long delays.
>
> In my experiments I've decreased ip_conntrack_max lower than number of hash
> buckets and got the "table full, dropping packet" errors in logs. I've looked on
> the conntrack list and found a huge number of conntracks that can be freed.
> However my hash bucket was empty and therefore I even did not have any chances
> to free something. That's why I would like to check the other hash buckets too.
>
> Ok, let's limit the number of conntracks that can be checked inside
> early_drop(). What do you prefer: some round number (for example 100) or
> fraction of ip_conntrack_max (for example 1%)?
A (small) fraction sounds better. We could even consider keeping track
of the number of conntracks that can be evicted (not assured), so in a
DOS situation we could save unnecessary table scans. Not sure if its
worth the effort though.
Anyway, please base your patch on the net-2.6.22 tree, which doesn't
include ip_conntrack anymore.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-06 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-06 8:00 [PATCH 2.6.21-rc6] [netfilter] early_drop imrovement Vasily Averin
2007-04-06 8:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-06 10:26 ` Vasily Averin
2007-04-06 15:08 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-04-07 11:45 ` [PATCH nf-2.6.22] " Vasily Averin
2007-04-07 12:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-08 5:02 ` Vasily Averin
2007-05-09 6:59 ` [NETFILTER] early_drop() imrovement (v3) Vasily Averin
2007-06-25 13:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-25 14:36 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-26 13:20 ` Vasily Averin
2007-06-26 13:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-27 8:46 ` [NETFILTER] early_drop() imrovement (v4) Vasily Averin
2007-06-27 8:52 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-27 12:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-27 12:29 ` Vasily Averin
2007-06-27 12:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-27 13:02 ` Vasily Averin
2007-06-27 13:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-27 13:25 ` Vasily Averin
2007-06-27 13:28 ` Patrick McHardy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-06 7:48 [PATCH 2.6.21-rc6] [netfilter] early_drop imrovement Vasily Averin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4616626C.9020100@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=vvs@sw.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox