From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
ck list <ck@vds.kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: Ten percent test
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:51:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <461939A4.2020305@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070408104125.GB11123@elte.hu>
On 04/08/2007 12:41 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> this is pretty hard to get right, and the most objective way to change
> it is to do it testcase-driven. FYI, interactivity tweaking has been
> gradual, the last bigger round of interactivity changes were done a year
> ago:
>
> commit 5ce74abe788a26698876e66b9c9ce7e7acc25413
> Author: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> Date: Mon Apr 10 22:52:44 2006 -0700
>
> [PATCH] sched: fix interactive task starvation
>
> (and a few smaller tweaks since then too.)
>
> and that change from Mike responded to a testcase. Mike's latest changes
> (the ones you just tested) were mostly driven by actual testcases too,
> which measured long-term timeslice distribution fairness.
Ah yes, that one. Here's the next one in that series:
commit f1adad78dd2fc8edaa513e0bde92b4c64340245c
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>
Date: Sun May 21 18:54:09 2006 -0700
Revert "[PATCH] sched: fix interactive task starvation"
It personally had me wonder if _anyone_ was testing this stuff...
Rene.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-08 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-28 16:37 [PATCH] sched: staircase deadline misc fixes Con Kolivas
2007-03-28 17:34 ` [ck] " Prakash Punnoor
2007-04-01 6:40 ` Prakash Punnoor
[not found] ` <b14e81f00704010724i3155a16en91074ab789416f3d@mail.gmail.com>
2007-04-01 20:03 ` Prakash Punnoor
2007-03-28 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-28 23:44 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-29 5:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-29 6:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-29 6:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-29 8:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-29 12:55 ` [ck] " michael chang
2007-04-03 2:35 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-03 2:37 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-03 5:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-03 6:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-03 6:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-03 6:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-05 11:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-05 11:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-05 11:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-05 11:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-05 13:18 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2007-04-05 15:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-05 11:54 ` [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest Ingo Molnar
2007-04-05 12:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-05 12:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-05 12:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-05 16:08 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-05 19:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-05 20:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-06 1:03 ` Ten percent test Con Kolivas
2007-04-06 9:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-06 9:28 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-06 10:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-06 10:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-07 6:50 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-07 16:12 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-07 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-07 18:23 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-07 18:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-07 20:30 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-08 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-08 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-08 17:04 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 4:03 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 4:08 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 5:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 13:01 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-08 11:33 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-08 11:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-08 12:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-08 17:57 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 4:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 5:23 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 6:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-08 17:56 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 4:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 5:16 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 6:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 8:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-08 18:51 ` Rene Herman [this message]
2007-04-09 4:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 12:14 ` Rene Herman
2007-04-09 13:27 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-04-09 19:54 ` Rene Herman
2007-04-09 14:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-09 17:05 ` Rene Herman
2007-04-09 17:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-09 19:09 ` Rene Herman
2007-04-09 19:56 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 17:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 13:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-09 15:37 ` Rene Herman
2007-04-07 19:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-07 20:31 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 17:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-09 18:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-09 18:44 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-07 16:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-08 13:08 ` Ed Tomlinson
2007-04-09 5:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 11:26 ` Ed Tomlinson
2007-04-09 16:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-22 10:48 ` [ck] " Martin Steigerwald
2007-04-22 11:15 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-10 2:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-10 11:23 ` Ed Tomlinson
2007-04-10 12:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-06 10:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-03 10:57 ` [PATCH] sched: staircase deadline misc fixes Mike Galbraith
2007-03-29 6:36 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-23 8:58 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=461939A4.2020305@gmail.com \
--to=rene.herman@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gene.heskett@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox