public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@gmail.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 000 of 14] knfsd: Preparation for IPv6 support in NFS server.)
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:45:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46200822.5060800@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <170fa0d20704131347u4a28b5d1h1959227980449fbf@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1518 bytes --]

Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Roland Dreier wrote:
>> >  > They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6 
>> support
>> >  > in the NFS server.
>> >  > They are *not* for 2.6.20, but should be ok for .21.
>> >
>> > Out of curiousity, does this patch series reduce the delta between the
>> > NFS/RDMA tree and mainline Linux?  In other words does this bring
>> > NFS/RDMA closer to merging?
>>
>> Hi Roland-
>>
>> The client side support for an RPC/RDMA module is almost completely
>> integrated into mainline.  There is still a minimal set of patches
>> required to support alternate transports in loadable kernel modules
>> which Trond has indicated he will integrate when the RPC/RDMA transport
>> is ready to be integrated.
> 
> Hi Chuck,
> 
> I must be missing something because I don't see _any_ trace of the
> core RPC over RDMA support (xprtrdma et al), your RPC Transport
> Switch, or any of the other supporting changes in mainline.  Could
> you, or others, please clarify the plan for merging RPC/RDMA?

The RPC transport switch patches are almost fully integrated into 
mainline.  The xprtrdma piece is what is not there yet.

>> At this time I'm not aware of a plan to integrate server-side support
>> for NFS/RDMA.  Perhaps the NetApp RDMA developers could respond.
> 
> Do you mean the NFS/RDMA server code from Tom Tucker of Open Grid
> Computing?  Why wouldn't this code be included?

Tom's code hasn't been reviewed by the community.

[-- Attachment #2: chuck.lever.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 315 bytes --]

begin:vcard
fn:Chuck Lever
n:Lever;Chuck
org:Oracle Corporation;Corporate Architecture: Linux Projects Group
adr:;;1015 Granger Avenue;Ann Arbor;MI;48104;USA
email;internet:chuck dot lever at nospam oracle dot com
title:Principal Member of Staff
tel;work:+1 248 614 5091
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-04-13 22:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-13 20:47 Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 000 of 14] knfsd: Preparation for IPv6 support in NFS server.) Mike Snitzer
2007-04-13 22:14 ` [NFS] Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: " Trond Myklebust
2007-04-15  3:40   ` Mike Snitzer
2007-04-16 14:13     ` James Lentini
2007-04-16 14:48       ` Mike Snitzer
2007-04-13 22:45 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2007-04-14  0:04   ` Merge plans for RPC/RDMA? (Was: Re: [NFS] " Mike Snitzer
2007-04-14  1:07     ` Chuck Lever
2007-04-14  1:14     ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46200822.5060800@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=snitzer@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox