From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753329AbXDOSyq (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:54:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753317AbXDOSyq (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:54:46 -0400 Received: from baros.cubic.ch ([213.239.213.98]:57417 "EHLO baros.cubic.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753329AbXDOSyq (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:54:46 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 439 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:54:45 EDT Message-ID: <46227334.3000002@cubic.ch> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:47:16 +0200 From: Tim Tassonis User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > + printk("Fair Scheduler: Copyright (c) 2007 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar\n"); So that's what all the fuss about the staircase scheduler is all about then! At last, I see your point. > i'd like to give credit to Con Kolivas for the general approach here: > he has proven via RSDL/SD that 'fair scheduling' is possible and that > it results in better desktop scheduling. Kudos Con! > How pathetic can you get? Tim, really looking forward to the CL final where Liverpool will beat the shit out of Scum (and there's a lot to be beaten out).