From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753958AbXDPWgz (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753973AbXDPWgz (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:55 -0400 Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:57050 "EHLO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753958AbXDPWgy (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:36:54 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: McEWkkYA1F7BEMSMJpWHBvgbJQBkXKa0Iz/XEeWaDEVu 1176763014 Message-ID: <4623FB0E.4080602@imap.cc> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:39:10 +0200 From: Tilman Schmidt Organization: me - organized?? User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061211 SeaMonkey/1.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robert P. J. Day" CC: i4ldeveloper@listserv.isdn4linux.de, Karsten Keil , LKML Subject: Re: so what *is* obsolete and removable? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigCDC12AD418B320CFCEDFF0A2" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCDC12AD418B320CFCEDFF0A2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 15.04.2007 22:55 schrieb Robert P. J. Day: > as i recall, the isdn4linux was *un*obsoleted, wasn't it? Actually, it wasn't. We *did* reach a consensus that isdn4linux is not obsolete in the accepted sense of the word, because there is no replacement for it so far. OTOH I have since submitted (twice, in fact) a patch that would remove the "(obsolete)" label from the Kconfig entry, but somehow nothing ever became of it. My submissions just linger in LKML, uncommented and unmerged. To sum it up, we agree that the "(obsolete)" label is wrong, but we won't remove it. I have no idea how to resolve that situation. What I do know is that it would be very wrong to remove isdn4linux, because it has an existing userbase with nowhere else to go. --=20 Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc Wehrhausweg 66 Fax: +49 228 4299019 53227 Bonn Germany --------------enigCDC12AD418B320CFCEDFF0A2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3rc1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGI/sWMdB4Whm86/kRAtt3AJ9JxxGz/H4LFKXDwIc9gD/k1re/SQCdHU0R FL5Vf5BrUWItWDfd0RfqZ6c= =S6cd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCDC12AD418B320CFCEDFF0A2--