Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Throttle swappiness for interactive tasks

[Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>]

Abhijit Bhopatkar wrote:

> I just wanted to know weather its worth going forward or we have
> better reasons to discount any such direction?

The reason that the wrong pages get swapped out sometimes
could be due to a side effect of the way the swappiness
policy is implemented.

While the VM only reclaims page cache pages, it will still
rotate through the anonymous pages on the LRU list, which
effectively randomizes the order of those pages on the list.

I need to get back to benchmarking my patch to split the
lists - anonymous and other swap backed pages on one set
of pageout lists, filesystem backed pages on another list.

One report I got was that the system is more interactive
under very heavy load, and my desktop system at the office
seems to behave better than it used to when I get back to
it after a few days.

Unfortunately my main desktop system at home depends on
Xen, so it's not as easy to use that patch there :(

-- 
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world, and those who believe it already is.  Each group
calls the other unpatriotic.