public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, shak <dshaks@redhat.com>,
	jakub@redhat.com, drepper@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:59:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <462C2F33.8090508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <462C2DC7.5070709@redhat.com>

Rik van Riel wrote:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
>> Rik van Riel wrote:
>>> Nick Piggin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rik van Riel wrote:
>>
>>>>> Here are the transactions/seconds for each combination:
> 
> I've added a 5th column, with just your mmap_sem patch and
> without my madv_free patch.  It is run with the glibc patch,
> which should make it fall back to MADV_DONTNEED after the
> first MADV_FREE call fails.
> 
>>>>>    vanilla   new glibc  madv_free kernel   madv_free + mmap_sem  
>>>>> mmap_sem
>>>>> threads
>>>>>
>>>>> 1     610         609             596                545         534
>>>>> 2    1032        1136            1196               1200        1180
>>>>> 4    1070        1128            2014               2024        2027
>>>>> 8    1000        1088            1665               2087        2089
>>>>> 16    779        1073            1310               1999        2012

Now that I think about it - this is all with the rawhide kernel
configuration, which has an ungodly number of debug config
options enabled.

I should try this with a more normal kernel, on various different
systems.

It would also be helpful if other people tried this same benchmark,
and others, on their systems.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-04-23  3:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-17  7:15 [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE Rik van Riel
2007-04-19 21:15 ` [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE 2/2 Rik van Riel
2007-04-20 21:03   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 21:24     ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-21  7:37       ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-21 16:32         ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-20 20:57 ` [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 21:38   ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-20 22:06     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 23:52       ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-21  0:48         ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-21  3:58           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-21  7:12         ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-23  4:36           ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-22  2:36         ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-22  2:50           ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-22  6:31           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23  0:16             ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23  3:53               ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23  3:58                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:07                   ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:12                     ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23  3:59                 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2007-04-23  9:20                   ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 10:21                     ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:31                       ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 10:35                         ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:44                           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24  1:15                             ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-24  1:58                               ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24  2:16                                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-24  4:42                                 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-04-24  5:13                                   ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24  2:53                           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24  3:08                             ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-23 10:44                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-23 11:45                     ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23  4:28           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-21  7:24     ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-21 18:06       ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-22  8:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-22  9:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-22 16:55     ` Ulrich Drepper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=462C2F33.8090508@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=dshaks@redhat.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox