public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, shak <dshaks@redhat.com>,
	jakub@redhat.com, drepper@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:45:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <462C9C74.8040707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <462C7A6F.9030905@redhat.com>

Rik van Riel wrote:

> First some ebizzy runs...

This is interesting.  Ginormous speedups in ebizzy[1] on my quad core
test system.  The following numbers are the average of 10 runs, since
ebizzy shows some variability.

You can see a big influence from the tlb batching and from Nick's
madv_sem patch.  The reduction in system time from 100 seconds to
3 seconds is way more than I had expected, but I'm not complaining.
The 4 fold reduction in wall clock time is a nice bonus.

According to Val, ebizzy shows the weaknesses of Linux with a real
workload, so this could be a useful result.

kernel
                    user     system     wall clock    %CPU

vanilla             186s    101s       123s          230%
madv_free (madv)    175s     96s       120s          230%
mmap_sem (sem)      100s     40s        40s          370%
madv+sem            200s    140s       100s          393%
madv+sem+tlb        118s      3s        30s          395%
madv+tlb            150s     10s        50s          310%

[1] http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0604.2/1699.html
-- 
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world, and those who believe it already is.  Each group
calls the other unpatriotic.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-04-23 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-17  7:15 [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE Rik van Riel
2007-04-19 21:15 ` [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE 2/2 Rik van Riel
2007-04-20 21:03   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 21:24     ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-21  7:37       ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-21 16:32         ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-20 20:57 ` [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 21:38   ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-20 22:06     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 23:52       ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-21  0:48         ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-21  3:58           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-21  7:12         ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-23  4:36           ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-22  2:36         ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-22  2:50           ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-22  6:31           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23  0:16             ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23  3:53               ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23  3:58                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:07                   ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:12                     ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23  3:59                 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23  9:20                   ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 10:21                     ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:31                       ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 10:35                         ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:44                           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24  1:15                             ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-24  1:58                               ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24  2:16                                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-24  4:42                                 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-04-24  5:13                                   ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24  2:53                           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24  3:08                             ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-23 10:44                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-23 11:45                     ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2007-04-23  4:28           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-21  7:24     ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-21 18:06       ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-22  8:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-22  9:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-22 16:55     ` Ulrich Drepper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=462C9C74.8040707@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=dshaks@redhat.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox