From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753934AbXDWVM7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:12:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753670AbXDWVM7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:12:59 -0400 Received: from smtp2.cc.ksu.edu ([129.130.7.16]:44656 "EHLO smtp2.cc.ksu.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753296AbXDWVM6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:12:58 -0400 Message-ID: <462CCFD8.2040907@ksu.edu> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:25:12 -0500 From: Amit Gud User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: suparna@in.ibm.com CC: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, val_henson@linux.intel.com, riel@surriel.com, zab@zabbo.net, arjan@infradead.org, brandon@ifup.org, karunasagark@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck References: <20070423162849.GB14113@in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20070423162849.GB14113@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Suparna Bhattacharya wrote: > Could you send this out as a patch to ext2 codebase, so we can just look > at the changes for chunkfs ? That might also make it small enough > to inline your patch in email for review. > > What kind of results are you planning to gather to evaluate/optimize this ? > Mainly I'm trying to gather following: - Graph of continuation inodes vs. the file system fragmentation (or aging) factor with varying configurations of chunk sizes - Graph of wall clock time vs. disk size + data on the disk with both chunkfs and native ext2, and/or other file systems AG -- May the source be with you. http://www.cis.ksu.edu/~gud