From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752904AbXDXPDt (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:03:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753240AbXDXPDt (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:03:49 -0400 Received: from zrtps0kn.nortel.com ([47.140.192.55]:63249 "EHLO zrtps0kn.nortel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752904AbXDXPDs (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:03:48 -0400 Message-ID: <462E1C2E.30406@nortel.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:03:10 -0600 From: "Chris Friesen" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rogan Dawes CC: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Nick Piggin , Gene Heskett , Juliusz Chroboczek , Mike Galbraith , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Williams , ck list , Thomas Gleixner , William Lee Irwin III , Andrew Morton , Bill Davidsen , Willy Tarreau , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44 References: <20070421160008.GA28783@elte.hu> <200704220959.34978.kernel@kolivas.org> <87647oblx5.fsf@pps.jussieu.fr> <20070423013429.GB25162@wotan.suse.de> <20070423191143.GA16849@elte.hu> <20070423203317.GA26668@elte.hu> <462DAC06.9040309@dawes.za.net> <20070424073103.GA29054@elte.hu> <462DBEF6.70205@dawes.za.net> In-Reply-To: <462DBEF6.70205@dawes.za.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2007 15:03:14.0868 (UTC) FILETIME=[AF065740:01C78681] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rogan Dawes wrote: > I guess my point was if we somehow get to an odd number of nanoseconds, > we'd end up with rounding errors. I'm not sure if your algorithm will > ever allow that. And Ingo's point was that when it takes thousands of nanoseconds for a single context switch, an error of half a nanosecond is down in the noise. Chris