From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933142AbXDZGxv (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:53:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933127AbXDZGxv (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:53:51 -0400 Received: from smtp104.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.214]:39879 "HELO smtp104.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S933133AbXDZGxt (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:53:49 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Yd4CXk8/jE/8gthKRuwYNvkpOk9fjic2vyoCNs2VqhlEdxtHGUGYIOEtBtrsksnYFBG7B9bQtu8NUzKYuyOtYmpBfF6OzsJnSkodLbxrP3s/67aEo7CZDwaFHpH+C1vd4DxmOLDw/6O/RLmQ2mxpuvVOw5OIZfBveDXi2czhUSs= ; X-YMail-OSG: OCdgNe8VM1kKgFj3V8p3Iwxp5hQXjFSn37Z4zEEUegMlv70imGagzMBNM9hOj9t6GHGWgNm1nA-- Message-ID: <46304C74.9040304@yahoo.com.au> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:53:40 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman , William Lee Irwin III , David Chinner , Jens Axboe , Badari Pulavarty , Maxim Levitsky Subject: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3 References: <20070424222105.883597089@sgi.com> <46303A98.9000605@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > > >>>The page cache has no problems supporting things with a block >>>size larger then page size. Now the block device layer may not >>>have the code to do the scatter gather into small pages and it >>>may not handle buffer heads whose data is split between multiple >>>pages. >> >>Yeah, this patch is not really large blocksize support (which we normally >>think of as block size > page cache size). > > > No? It depends on how you define block size. This patch definitely allows > a set blocksize function call with a size larger than 4k. Yeah because it is still <= page cache page size. Anyway, that's just semantics, it doesn't matter. >>>I suspect what needs to be fixed is the page cache block device >>>interface so that we have helper functions that know how to stuff >>>a single block into several pages. >> >>I am working now and again on some code to do this, it is a big job but >>I think it is the right way to do it. But it would take a long time to >>get stable and supported by filesystems... > > > Ummm... We already have a radix tree for this???? What more is needed? You > just need to go through all filesystems and make them use extends. I'm talking about block size > page size in the buffer layer. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.